top of page

Chapter X

Running Time

 

   Still Hunting is not a system of any special tricks any more than sparring is. The art of self-defense consists in the rapid, almost automatic, application of a very few principles deeply founded in commonsense. Any one knows that a quick blow is better than a slow one; that a straight blow is better than a curving one; that a slight parry that merely turns aside an opponent's blow is quite as effective as one that knocks it aside, and much more easy to make quickly; that dodging a blow is often better than stopping it; that the left hand can strike as hard and quickly as the right, etc. etc. Yet, strangely enough, a man left to himself falls naturally into the clumsy, awkward methods of the rural boxer. And to get him into the most natural, easy, and common-sense way of striking, parrying, etc., requires an immense amount of instruction and drilling. It is the same with still-hunting. The trick part of it amounts to almost nothing. The principles are all natural, founded in common-sense, and simple. You must first learn what they are, and especially what they are not. Then they must be followed until you follow them unconsciously and become a bundle of good habits.

  We have now gone through all the leading principles involved in still-hunting in the woods before snow falls. And many of these I have repeated even at the risk of being tedious; for I well know their extreme importance, and how easily one forgets them just at the critical moment. The principals involved in tracking and in hunting open ground will be given farther on, and the same effort made to impress them upon the memory. Any more illustration of plain hunting in the woods before snow would now be too tiresome on account of the repetition of the leading principles we have already seen. Moreover, to follow out in de- tail all the varying scenes of the still-hunt and all the special modifications of general principles rendered necessary from time to time by change of ground, wind, light, actions of the deer, etc., would swell this book to a size that would seal its fate at once. We will therefore pass on to what is known among hunters as the " running-time."

  The expressions "rutting-time" and "running-time" are generally used to mean the same thing. But the " running-time" is really only the climax of the "rutting-time."

  The "rutting-time" begins at different times in different sections, depending upon climate and elevation. And even in any one place it is difficult to say just when it begins and when it ends. But at periods varying from September to December, inclusive of those months, the does will be in season. And in the North and West this is about the time of the first heavy frosts.

  For several weeks before the does are ready the bucks begin to get uneasy. Their necks swell to an unusual thickness, as you noticed in the one you shot yesterday. They keep on foot later in the morning and start out earlier in the afternoon. They roam more widely than before; so much so that it becomes a tedious task to track them unless the track be very fresh and it be quite late in the morning. You have doubtless on your last few hunts noticed places where the ground had been pawed and scraped bare in spots two feet or more in diameter, and that on this bare spot were unmistakable tracks of a big hoof. You saw, too, some bushes that had been bent, twisted, and broken by horns, very different in appearance from the marks you saw some time since of frayed bark on sapling brush, etc., and which was done by the buck rubbing the velvet from his horns late in summer. The brush now looks as if worsted in a fight with a pair of horns. And such is the case.

  These signs show the beginning of " running-time." But as yet there is no difference of which you can take advantage.

  Though a doe is still occasionally seen in company with a buck, the majority of them now keep away from him. And he spends a large portion of his time traveling about in search of them. This he generally does on a walk and with head well down. At first he does this only early in the morning and late in the evening. But as the season advances his ardor increases, and for ten or twelve days he follows them, often on a half- walk and half-trot, varied at times with a clumsy gallop very different from the graceful canter with which he vacates the vicinity of danger. And at the height of this time he often spends the greater part of the day in this amusement.

  During the height of the season it is no uncommon thing for a doe to be pursued by three or four and even more bucks, one after the other. They are not together, but a short distance apart. Generally the biggest one is ahead, and the procession tapers off to a two-year-old or so, keeping a respectful distance in the rear. But sometimes they come together, and then there is a clattering of horns, flashing of greenish- blue eyes, and an elevation of hair that is decidedly entertaining to one who can keep his finger from the trigger long enough to "see it out."

  If at the time when a doe is pursued by one or more of these ardents a hunter happens to be upon her course, either before or after she passes, he may be overwhelmed with a perfect avalanche of success before he knows it. A deer running on a gallop is always blind enough to anything ahead of him that does not move. But when thus inflamed with passion the buck is so much so that he often does not care even for a thing that does move a little, and will sometimes charge past or nearly upon the hunter in spite of all bleating, whistling, or any other noise with which the hunter may try to stop him. The havoc wrought in a 'novice's nervous organization by such an onset may well be imagined; and fortunate is he if he has any nerve left by the time the others arrive, which is generally in a very few minutes, or even seconds.

  I have myself never seen more than three bucks after one doe, and that but once; but I know several well-authenticated cases of four and five, and one case of seven being killed behind one doe in less than fifteen minutes, so well attested that I feel obliged to believe it.

  But all such cases as even four or five are now the rare exception, and one might spend the whole running-time without ever getting on the course of a buck following a doe either in company or alone.

  And if you do not thus get on their course you are no better off than if it were not " running-time."

  I have seen some very silly stuff in print about the ease with which any blockhead can kill a deer in " running-time." This always comes from the advocates of driving deer with hounds men who generally know nothing of still-hunting, but think it necessary to defend hounding by condemning still-hunting. If one happens on the right runway and does not get flurried when the procession comes, this is true enough. But unless he happens upon the course of a doe, he can do nothing more than at any other time.

  It is said " all one has to do is to lie along a runway and shoot."

  Now unless deer are extremely plenty the chances of getting on a runway likely to be used that day for such a parade are all against the hunter. And there is absolutely nothing by which the most experienced hunter can decide what runway deer will take at such a time unless he has already seen them in motion.

  The habits of deer in forming and traveling in run- ways or paths are peculiar, and vary with localities in a way difficult to reduce to rule. In nearly all countries deer will form runways when the snow gets deep, but by that time they are generally so poor that only the brute will molest them. On bare ground deer will generally form runways in very hilly, rocky, brushy, or swampy ground. But it is equally certain that on such ground they often do not form them.

  They also, on some kinds of ground, change their runways so often that when you find one you cannot feel certain that it will be traveled again at all. And they often have so many that you cannot decide whether the next travel upon any one will be to-day or next week. Again, a road made by a small band of deer passing only once over a piece of soft ground may have all the appearance of a runway and yet never again be used. The best thing to do with run-ways, except for hounding, is to let them entirely alone. One can do an immense amount of aggravating waiting at even the best of them. And if deer are plenty enough to make it worthwhile to watch a runway at all, you can generally do better by keeping in motion, as you have done before "running-time." Though the "rutting-time" is long, the part of it that will be of much aid to the novice is very short; while the ease, advantages, and pleasures of lying by a run-way and taking in a string of bucks are most absurdly exaggerated. Moreover, the does, yearlings, and fawns are just as wild now as at any other time. And even the old buck, though he may be a crazy fool while actually running, yet that same buck, when he cools down and goes off to feed or lie down, is just about as wary and hard to approach as at any other time of year. When the leaves are dry and stiff, or from any cause the woods cannot be traversed quietly, then runway watching may do.

  Otherwise the best way to utilize "running-time" for both sport and success is to hunt just about as we did before, but with a slight change of ground. In this way we shall lose no other advantages and retain all the advantages of the " running-time." And it certainly has advantages which can neither be ignored nor despised.

  As in your other still-hunting, you must not let the sun tread upon your heels, but should be in the woods early. And you might as well go, as before, directly to the oak ridges, because the does and yearlings and fawns will not neglect eating, as the buck now sometimes does, and they will be found in about the same places as before. Moreover, as a matter of fact, aside from any foolish notions about the superior glory of bagging a big buck, or having a "head" to mount as a "trophy" genuine "vanity of vanities" the does, fawns, and yearlings are apt to be far the best game. A big buck is now far more apt to be an old fool than a fawn ever is to be a young fool, and the adage " No fool to an old fool " never had a truer application than when applied to an ardent buck when running. So that when you kill a fawn of six or eight months old at this time it is a much greater achievement than to kill a buck when after a doe. The bucks, too, at this time are apt to be strong and musky in flavor. Some of them become intolerably so and cannot be eaten. It is a common idea that the removal of the scrotum and penis prevents this. But this is mainly an idea. It may do some good; but the fact is that some bucks, even with thickly swelled necks, are not at all strong flavored, while others are as rank as a muskrat all over, in spite of the instant removal of the genital organs, and this flavor cannot be eliminated in any way so as to make it palatable to any one but a city snob who eats venison for style.

  Still, some of the bucks are good, and the younger they are the more apt are they to be good. And to find them you should keep a keen watch around the heads of big ravines and along their dividing ridges; also along creek-bottoms, flats, and hollows where there is some brush, but not too thick. But other ground must not be neglected, and a good watch should be kept everywhere; for a buck is apt to get on the trail of a doe at any point and overtake her anywhere.

  If the ground be very broken, the ridges high, and the ravines deep, you will be apt to find runways along the bottoms, up the sides, and around the heads of ravines, especially crossing the dividing ridge be- tween the head of one ravine and that of another running towards it from an opposite direction. You will also find them along or crossing the "divide" be- tween ravines running in the same direction. If you find runways numerous or well traveled, you might as well spend the day in lounging around such places, taking a seat from time to time upon some ridge that commands a good view of both ridges and hollows and their heads. And even where deer do not form runways, if you find them plenty it will be worth while to do the same thing at this time of year. But do not allow any affinity that may spring up between you and a comfortable log to become too lasting, unless there are well-traveled runways and deer are quite plenty.

  When moving on a runway look frequently behind you as well as ahead, for a deer is as liable to come from one direction as from another. When you see fresh tracks of the size of a doe's hoof it is well to wait there some time, for a buck may be from five to thirty minutes behind a doe as well as close to her. Should you see the doe and shoot her, or should she escape, remain there fifteen or twenty minutes, keeping a keen watch in the direction from which she came. It by no means follows, though, that a doe has a buck behind her, or that there is more than one buck behind her. Where deer are plenty the chances are the other way. Should you see a buck coming towards you, be in no haste. If you are on the course of the doe, there is no probability of his sheering to either side if you keep still. Let him come directly towards you. If walking, you can generally halt him with a bleat. But if you can shoot well enough, and are cool enough, it is best to halt him with a ball, for there is some little risk of his getting away if you try otherwise to halt him. When you have shot one buck, remove the scrotum and slit him at once in the chest like a hog cutting the throat does not half bleed a deer and then go back a few paces on his course and wait for a successor, etc.

  It is better in the long-run to keep slowly moving for the most of the time. And your eye must be as keen as ever. A deer, even when moving, is often very hard to see. They are not only low along the ground, but are very fast and silent walkers. Even after you see one it can slip out of your sight with wonderful ease, and this, too, where it suspects nothing, but its disappearance is entirely accidental. You must remember this in all cases where you once get your eye upon a moving deer, and either try to get closer to it or try to get ahead of it upon its course, so as to wait for it. A very big buck can slip out of sight, horns and all, in brush so thin and low that you would never dream of his escape.

  As a rule, the following of tracks in " running-time" is not remunerative. The bucks roam for miles, and the does travel farther than at other times. Still, where you find fresh tracks leading to a " slash," toward the middle of the day it will be well to go there if you have snow to make the tracking easy. And yearlings and fawns you may track as at other times.

Chapter XI

Hunting On Snow

  

   The climax of pleasure and generally of skill is reached in tracking up your game so as to get a good shot at it. Many of the best still-hunters will not hunt at all until snow comes, and in the Eastern and Northwestern States the season may be said to commence only "when snow flies," as they say in the woods.

  Tracking upon snow and upon bare ground are generically the same, but specifically so different as to require separate treatment. And tracking upon snow being the easiest, we will consider it first.

  To follow a deer's track upon snow is so easy a matter that almost any one of any tact at all can do it with a trifling bit of practice in judging of the freshness of the marks and the snow thrown out ahead of the footprints. As we go on we will notice the prominent features of a fresh trail.

​

   Two very natural mistakes are, however, apt to be made by the novice who hunts upon snow:

    1st. That a fresh trail is to be followed as a matter of course.
    2nd. That he is to follow directly upon it.

 

  The advantage of snow for still-hunting lies not alone in enabling one to locate a deer and come up with him. It lies quite as much in softening the ground and deadening the sound of your steps; in making a background upon which you may the more easily discover your game; in enabling you to speedily ascertain the quantity and quality of the deer about you, the direction they have taken, what they were doing, and how long since they passed, etc. etc. To follow up tracks is often folly. An old buck in " running-time" will often lead you too long a race. A doe may then do the same. If tracks consist of jumps or half-jumps, or half-trot or half-walk and half-jump, it generally shows that the deer are alarmed, especially if there are places where they have stopped and turned around or sideways to look back. It will then be quite useless to follow them except as hereafter directed. If the deer are much hunted by still- hunters, they will be so likely to watch their back track even when lying down that it will be quite vain to keep on the track. Where the ground is very brushy or very level it is rarely advisable to follow a trail unless the deer are very tame or you can use a cow-bell or horse. And where deer are plenty and you are well acquainted with the ground, knowing all the ridges, passes, feeding-places, and lying-down ground, it is often better to let tracks entirely alone and hunt as you have done heretofore to find them on foot at feeding-time, or standing in or around thickets during the day, or lying down. This is the course pursued by many of the best hunters quite as often as tracking. They use the tracks only as a general guide, and depend mainly upon the other advantages of the snow above mentioned.

 

   But whether you follow tracks or not, there are some points ever to be remembered:

    1st. That while snow enables you to see a deer much farther as well as more quickly and distinctly than upon bare ground, it also gives the deer precisely the same advantage over you, an advantage which you cannot in heavy timber avoid by all the white clothes and hats you can invent.
    2nd. That though snow deadens the sharpness or distinctness of sounds, yet dull sounds, like the crushing of dead or rotten sticks beneath the foot, will be conveyed along the ground as well as ever, and perhaps even better if the snow be wet.
    3nd. That it may make an entirely new noise by grinding or packing under your foot when deep and dry, unless you work your foot into it toe first; or when a little stiff or crusty from thaw or rain, it may make a noise worse than any it hides. And both these new noises being conveyed along the ground, and being unmistakable in their character, will frighten a wild deer farther and more effectually than any other kind of noise. And in no respect must any of the caution to be observed in hunting on bare ground be relaxed.

 

  Not only is it a great pleasure to work up a trail, but where deer are scarce it is often essential to success. And as hunting on snow without tracking does not materially differ from what we have already been over, we will pass at once to tracking.

  About all the descriptions of tracking deer that it has ever been my lot to see were nothing but exaggerated rabbit-hunts, such as when a boy I used to take before breakfast on the first " tracking-snow" of the season. They all depict a man sneaking along on the trail until he comes up with the deer, which he knocks over as a matter of course. The deer is bigger than a rabbit; its distance from the hunter is a few yards greater than the distance the rabbit generally is; and a rifle is used instead of a shot-gun. In all else they are par excellence rabbit-hunts. Where deer are very tame, one may sometimes be tracked and bagged almost as easily as a rabbit. But even then it is the rare exception. And where they are wild, the exception is so very rare that it may be thrown entirely out of consideration. In no way can you get so good an idea of what tracking very wild deer is as by seeing what it is not. And in accordance with our plan we will see first what mistakes you will naturally fall into, and how to avoid them.

  A light feathery snow of about two inches in depth which fell last evening now covers the ground. And again we tread the woods by the time it is light enough to distinguish a deer. For the earlier we get upon a track the less the distance we shall have to follow it, and the more likely we shall be to find our game on foot instead of lying down where we may have to depend upon a running shot.

  Here is a track already. But it will not be best to follow it, as it was made last night soon after the snow ceased falling. Compare it with your own track and see how the snow thrown out ahead of the hole lacks the sparkle of that thrown from your track. You see, too, that the edges of the hole made by the deer's foot do not glisten like the edges of the one you have made. All this is because the crystals of snow have lost their keenness of edge by evaporation a process that takes place in the very driest snow and coldest air. Stoop low and examine the deer's tracks closely, and notice a little fallen snow and a few faint particles of fine dust from the trees in them. This dust is always falling even in the very stillest weather. But you need nothing more reliable than the mere appearance of the snow around the edge and in front of the track. With a few days' practice you can tell a trail five minutes old from one five hours old, even in dry snow. But we will leave this trail, for we shall surely find fresher ones.

  Here we come to one that is quite fresh. But the size of the footprints, as well as their distance apart, shows the trail to be that of a large buck. As it is the height of running-time we will let him go.

  Ah! Here is what we want a trail of a doe and two fawns. They are going, too, toward the acorn ridges a good place to catch them.

  With watchful eye you steal cautiously along the trails. These lead to the acorn ridges, and here they begin to separate. The deer evidently have stopped traveling, and are now straggling about here and there. Your common-sense now tells you that they have probably stopped to feed a bit here and may be very close, perhaps just over the next ridge. Therefore you redouble your caution about noise, and look more keenly than ever at every spot that can possibly be a bit of a deer's coat. All of which is very well.

  In a moment or two you reach the top of the first ridge, and a good long look at all the ground in sight shows you no deer. But you find where deer have pawed up the snow for acorns. The trails, too, cross and recross each other here, so that you can follow nothing. And they become mixed, too, with other deer-tracks until you are quite confused. You consider yourself fully equal, however, to this emergency, and resolve to cut the knot by the very simple device of the rabbit- tracker a circle.

  This plan is correct enough in itself. But why do it now? If the deer are still on these ridges you need not follow their tracks at all, but look for them just as you would do if the ridges were bare, as in your previous hunts. Your chances of seeing them in that way are quite good enough. And by the amount and variety of tracks you see there are other deer about, and some are probably feeding on the ridges this very minute. Never mind the tracks now, but slip around to the leeward of the breeze that you see is just beginning to sift down a little fine snow from the tree-tops above. Do not lose the advantage of the wind for the sake of following tracks now. You can follow those tracks in two hours as well as you can now; and if the deer have gone away to lie down or lounge, they will then be little farther away than they now are. Keep to the leeward and remain on these ridges at least an hour more.

  But your anxiety to follow them is too great, and you start on a circle to find their trail again. In five minutes the circle is completed. Yet your stock of information on the subject of those three deer remains unchanged. You find only confusion worse con- founded, a complete network of trails. You should have made your circle four or five times as large as you did make it.

  You see this mistake, and set out upon a much larger circle than before. And while doing this, one of the first things you discover is a series of long jumps down a ridge to the left. Following these back as before advised, to find how you lost that deer, you find that he was feeding just over a ridge only a hundred yards from where you began your first circle, and that by the time that circle was half completed, you with your eyes fixed upon the ground, where they had no business to be, came directly into his sight.

  Two hundred yards more of your second circle brings you to another object of peculiar, often painful, interest to anxious hunters two more sets of long jumps where two yearlings have scattered the snow, leaves, and dirt with their plunging hoofs. In the excitement of your circle business you quite over- looked the little matter of wind, and they probably smelt you. Or they may have been stampeded by the running of the other one, for he must have passed somewhere near here. And the running of a deer will nearly always alarm every deer within hearing of the sound of his hoofs. So generally will they take alarm from any other animal.

  By the time your circle is nearly completed you find that the doe and two fawns have left the ridges and gone across a flat creek-bottom. This does not, however, prove your circle enterprise a profitable one, for you could easily have discovered this in time without throwing away the prospects you had for a shot at the other three deer.

  You follow the trail of the doe and fawns across the creek, where it turns and goes up the creek-bottom some twenty or thirty yards from the creek. Thus far they have been walking along nearly together, and at an ordinary pace. But now the trails are separating and the steps get shorter and more ir- regular. Here one has wandered off a few rods to one side ; here another has stopped at a bush and nibbled a few twigs ; there the old one has been traveling rather aimlessly around and through a patch of black-haws. All these signs tell you to be very careful, for they may be within sight at this instant, though they may also have gone on half a mile or more. On the way to lie down deer will often stop an hour or two in such a place to browse and stand around a while. That is what these have been doing, and as it is yet early they may yet be here.

  Priding yourself upon your caution and acuteness you move quietly along, with rifle ready and eyes piercing every bush far into the distance, for some three hundred yards. There on the other side of a thin patch of wild-plum bushes you find that refreshing sight with which your eyes are already so familiar, the long-jumps. There are three sets of them, and all beautifully long. At first you are inclined to ejaculate; but your chagrin yields at once to wonder, for a glance into the brush shows you that they were all on foot in it when they started. Yet the brush is so thin that you can see plainly all through it, and you recognize the plum-patch as one at which you looked very keenly some two hundred yards back and thought then that you could see distinctly through it.

  And you naturally wonder how they got started. Well, when your head first arrived in sight of that brush they were standing in there, two of them browsing, the other looking back in the direction from which they came. You have already been told of what an advantage the animal that is at rest has over the one that is moving. You have also learned that an animal in brush can see out much better than one outside can see in. And I must again remind you that a deer standing still in brush is, even with the aid of snow as a background, one of the hardest things in the world to detect with the eye.

  But you cannot comprehend how they could have run without your seeing them at all. If they saw enough, of your head to take the alarm, how could their whole bodies escape your eyes, especially when that bit of brush was the first thing on which your eyes rested when you came in sight of it at all ? It is rather a puzzle, it is true; but its only solution is this: a deer's eyes, when watching his back track, are as keen to detect a motion in the woods as are those of the wildest antelope on the plain. Some people who had never hunted very wild deer would doubt this, but as you have an hour or two now of time that is not very precious I will show you how extremely true it is. It will reduce your opinion of yourself considerably below par, but it will reward you well in future, and also give you a good idea of the general futility of following upon the track of a deer that you have started.

  Let us follow, then, the trail of these three and see if we can again get sight of them. Do not try to get a shot; be content with even a sight. Go right ahead on the trail and look into the woods as far and as keenly as you can. Nearly half a mile you follow them, the long jumps still continuing. Here they have skipped a high fallen log, and in three places the snow is switched from it by their descending tails. Here one has smashed through a bush, scattering snow and dead branches around, and there another has struck some boggy ground and splashed mud and water around in fine style. But suddenly the jumps slacken to a trot ; in a few yards that stops, and you find where they have stopped and huddled up, one standing sideways, the other two turning all the way around. And then the long jumps begin again, still longer now than before.

  And yet the ground is all quite open. They stopped behind no brush, no logs, no rising ground, .nothing to hide them from your sight. Yet it is evident that they stopped here and looked back, and that they then started again in sudden alarm. Yet the wind and the distance are such that they could neither have heard nor smelt you. They must therefore have seen you; yet you saw nothing of them, although they were under full headway. Do you think this impossible ? Does it seem that the second run must have been only a continuance of the first run? Then by all means follow them to the next place where they stop to look back and see what they do there.

  On, on, on, on, nearly half a mile farther go the tracks, as if the deer were in a hurdle-race over the biggest logs to be found. Then they suddenly stop and huddle up; and then as suddenly go on again in jumps as long as ever.

  And so you might keep on the livelong day, seeing perhaps two or three times a faint glimpse of dark evanescence among the distant trunks, but seeing nothing long enough to raise the rifle upon, and four fifths of the time seeing not a trace of game at all. And yet all the time it is evident that the deer have each time seen you. And five times out of six such will be your experience with very wild deer, whether they be old bucks or young fawns. The sixth time you may perhaps get a long standing shot or a closer running one in the course of half a day's chase, but neither will be good enough to give you much prospect of hitting.

  The principal difference between these and deer that are not very wild is that you will generally get sight of the latter, but rarely until they are running away. And when you do see them standing it will rarely he long enough, nor will they generally be close enough, for anything like a certain shot. This applies to the latter deer only when they have once been started. Deer that are not very wild seldom or never have the trick of watching back upon their track before being started.

  You passed a fresh track of a big buck a few moments ago that led toward the slash. He has gone there to rest a bit after his morning travels. You had better try him, for " anybody can kill a buck in running-time." At least that is what they say.

  You start off upon his track with much more care than you did upon the trail of the others. But this is only time wasted. The woods here are quite open for several hundred yards, and as far as you can see there are no windfalls, brush-patches, or brushy ridges.

  There is no probability that he has stopped anywhere along such ground as this when, if you remember the woods as you should do, the old slash is less than half a mile in the direction the track is leading.

  Reaching the slash you find the trail winds over a ridge and down into a little basin. You look very long and carefully into the basin, thoroughly inspecting all the brush it contains. Seeing nothing, you descend and follow the trail across it and up the end of a ridge that juts into it. On the point of this ridge, in a clump of low briers, you find a large, fresh, warm bed, with the well-known long jumps leading away from it.

  Now stoop low in this bed and you can still see every step of the way you came for a hundred and fifty or two hundred yards back. While your eyes were intently fixed upon the track he saw you and departed.

  Now what was the use in keeping your eyes so much upon the track? Can you not tell well enough about where it is going to be able to go at least fifty yards without looking at it? And if you must look at it, can you not do so with an occasional side glance of the eye that does not take your attention from anything beyond? And where the necessity of treading so constantly in the tracks? And what was the use in going into that basin at all? Could you not just as well have wound around it out of sight behind this ridge to the right? And by so doing could you not have found out whether the buck passed out of the basin, and just where he left it, quite as surely as you could have done by having both eyes and feet half the time in his tracks? Had you done this he would not have seen you so soon; and when he did see you, you would have had a good running shot at him.

  Turn off now to one side and keep down along the edge of the " slash” and see if any more deer have come from the timber to lie down in here.

  A few moments' walk brings you to the trail of two yearlings. These you follow for quarter of a mile into the "slash," using all your care, skill, eyesight, and caution about noise, moving not over half a mile an hour, working each foot toe first through the snow so as to feel any possible stick or brush that may crack beneath it, easing off any twig that could possibly scratch on your clothes, and looking, looking, looking oh so keenly! You reap at last a common reward of honest, patient toil a sight of two sets of long plunging jumps leading away from two fresh warm beds. The sun smiles sweetly as ever down through the bracing air ; the lonely pines are as dignified and solemn as usual; the luxuriant briers embrace your trowsers as fraternally as ever ; and the old logs and stumps loom up around you more smiling and bigger than before. But sight or sound of venison there is none, and you are the sole being in a dreary microcosm of snow, brush, briers, stumps, logs, and dead trees.

 

Chapter XII

The Surest Way To Track Deer When Very Wild

​

  Your high opinion of the merits of a " tracking-snow" for deer underwent yesterday a very serious modification. And if you had continued hunting a few days as you did yesterday you might have concluded that snow was no better than bare ground for hunting deer. Your error was a very common and natural one, yet one that you might hunt a long time without even suspecting.

  You have already seen how deer, when once started, watch their back track so keenly that you not only stand no chance of getting a shot, but can rarely get even sight of them again. And a single deer can do this just as well as a dozen could. All deer are so nearly alike in this respect that it will rarely avail you to follow tracks of those you have started. But deer that are little hunted, especially when not hunted by tracking, generally pay no more attention to their back track than to any other direction ; that is, previous to being alarmed. But when much hunted by tracking they finally drift into a state of chronic suspicion of their back track. Hence they will learn to watch it with as much care before being started as they do after being started; and they will select places to lie down in from which they can see back upon quite a portion of their trail. And this instinct is transmitted by descent until even the fawns will watch back.

  I do not mean that all deer, even very wild ones, will always do this, but so many of them will that it is best to hunt on the assumption that all will. The greater includes the less, and you will lose little or nothing by dealing with the very tamest deer as if they were the very wildest. On the contrary, the use of care and skill even in the highest degree will repay you heavily even when hunting the tamest deer that are now to be found.

  Let us now try another style of tactics. Here is the trail of a doe and two yearlings that have left the ridges about half an hour ago. They have done feeding and have gone off to lie down. As you al- ready know they may lounge about an hour or two before they go to lie down. And during this hour or two they may go a quarter of a mile only or a full mile, but probably will not go over half a mile.

  You are in a part of the woods that is new to you. But never mind that. Glance over the ground as far as you can and see if you cannot get a pretty fair idea of where those deer will go. You know that somewhere on the north is the " slash," and that there are windfalls and brushy ridges to the east. All the better to know this. But let us suppose you have no idea of the " lay of the land " beyond what you can see from here.

  Far away in the direction the tracks have gone you can make out the dim outline of a long strip of brush such as generally lines a little creek. Along that creek there is likely to be a flat with more or less brush in it. It was to such ground that your doe and fawns went yesterday. There is plenty of such ground in nearly all woods, and it is a favorite place for deer to while away an hour or two at this time of day.

  Such ground, too, is apt to have a ridge on the farther side of it. There was a ridge on the side of the creek-bottom where you started the doe and fawns yesterday, but you never thought of getting behind it. Now the chances are four to one that these deer are going to that creek-bottom, and once there the chances are four to one that they will remain there a while, and in leaving it will go either up or down it for some distance.

  Suppose now you let this track entirely alone, strike the creek-bottom some three hundred yards ' below where this trail will probably cross it, go across the bottom and over the ridge beyond. If the deer have gone down the bottom you will cross their track; and if you do not cross any you will have their location partly determined.

  Now travel along behind the ridge, and out of sight, for some hundred yards or so. Then look carefully over and examine all the ground in sight. Back off and go along behind the crest of the ridge another hundred yards or so and then take another look. You see at once the advantage of this an advantage so great that even the advantage of wind had better be subordinated to it, especially as scent blowing over a ridge is not so apt to reach anything in a valley; at all events, not until you first have a good chance to see the game.

  But how do you keep the track all this time ? Per- haps they have recrossed the creek.

  And suppose they have; is it not probable that they will still continue up the creek-bottom as before? And are not both sides of the creek-bottom in sight of the ridge where you are? And even if it is, in places, quite far, are not your chances of seeing the deer at least as good as if you were directly on the track again, and on low ground too ? It is difficult to see how, next to following the track itself, you can do anything more certain to find them than what you are now doing. You know they have not gone below ; if they cross the ridge you are on you will meet their track; if they keep on up the creek-bottom you will be on a parallel with them; and if they recross the creek and go in the direction they came from, which is highly improbable, you will only lose a little time in finding it out. And such time will not be important, for such a movement will generally indicate that they have gone to lie down, in which case there is certainly no haste. And no matter what your opinion may be about where they have gone, until you know they are off this ground be in no haste. Let your motto in tracking always be, Positively no haste, except on such kinds of ground as clear open woods, etc., where deer so rarely stop that it does not repay you to lose time.

  For three hundred or four hundred yards more you keep behind the ridge, which is sometimes low, sometimes high, sometimes near, and sometimes far from the creek, and sometimes cut with a hollow. Yet you see nothing, though you stop at every seventy or eighty yards and take a good look. The creek-bottom goes on some distance yet, and they are probably still ahead.

  Yet wherever it is possible, without too much danger of being seen, to slip in and see if you are still parallel with the track, it is better to do so. And here is a good opportunity to do that very thing, for just ahead of you a little streamlet runs into the creek. Its bottom is low, and its sides are so fringed with brush that you can steal down to the main creek with little danger of being seen.

  You reach the main creek and find no tracks. They must then have crossed it. The ridges on the other side are now nearly as close to the creek as those you have just left. Might it not be expedient to get be- hind them instead of going back to the others? Undoubtedly it would be if you can get behind them without being seen, and that you can easily do by going back two hundred or three hundred yards or so. The loss of that much distance amounts to nothing, and you can there cross the track and find its course as well as here.

  But stop; not that way. Go back behind your ridge again and retrace your old track. It looks like unnecessary particularity, I admit, but then it takes little time. And take my word for it when I tell you that a fair percentage of your failures in still-hunting comes from leaving in your net a few loose knots^ to tighten which would have cost you only a trifle more of work, care, and time. And mark another thing. While going back do not neglect to look the creek-bottom over again because you have once examined it.

  Back you go nearly two hundred yards, looking over the ridge from time to time as before. Over across the creek upon -ground you thoroughly scanned before something catches your eye. It is only a spot about the size of your hat, but in shape it is marvelously like the haunch of a deer that is almost hidden by the upturned butt of a huge fallen tree. The tree has lain there a long time ; brush has grown up around it; its trunk and branches alone would hide a dozen deer standing behind it. Therefore be very careful.

 

   Several questions now crowd and jostle each other in your mind:

    1st. Is it a deer?
    2nd. If so, is it not too small a mark to hit at such a distance (at least a hundred and fifty yards) ?
    3rd. If too far, shall I try to get closer or wait for it to move and present a fuller mark ?
    4th. Which way shall I go to get closer, directly toward it or go up the creek a way and come down ?
    5th. If I wait for it to move, may it not move out of my sight as well as into it ?

 

   All these are very pertinent, but are easy to answer:

    1st. It has the unmistakable outline of a deer's haunch. The shape of the lower part and leg settles that sufficiently to make it worth while to risk a shot. It is very dark in color, but then a deer nearly always looks dark upon a background of snow.
    2nd. It is too small a mark for a novice to shoot at from this distance. If you raise your sights or hold over it you are very liable to miss it. If you draw a fine sight on it you are liable to miss it or only break a leg. It is a shot which none but a skilled marksman skilled in the field on game can make with certainty even with a rest.
    3rd. Even if it moves and shows its full body, it will still be too fine a shot for a beginner to make, so you had better get closer.
    4th. The farther you can keep from the deers' back track in approaching them the better. The other two are undoubtedly there watching, and may be on this side of the log, and standing up, too, although you do not see them.
    5th. It is just as liable to move out of your sight as in it. But then another one is just as liable to move into your sight as remain out of it, as at present.

  

   On the whole, your best chance is to go back to where you came to the creek a while ago, cross it, and, stooping low, swing around in line with any little rise of ground, windfall, or heavy clump of brush, etc., you find between you and the deer, get behind that and wait patiently. For if you try to get close enough to the fallen tree to see the deer, you will be quite apt to see nothing but the flip of their tails as they make off in line with it. And if you wait a while they will be quite certain to move and perhaps come towards you. And if they lie down there, you will then be able to approach much closer than you now can, and get a much better running shot since you would probably have to take one anyhow than you now could.

  A very slight change of circumstances would modify all this advice. If you were a good cool shot it would be better perhaps to shoot from where you are; and so it would be better even for a poor shot if he had to approach that tree from the trail-side, or from open ground above. And if there were a ridge near by on the other side it would be better to get behind that. And all these considerations might be changed again by the question of wind. It would be impossible within the limits of a readable book to go through every case of this sort with its modifications. But when you are once familiar with the representative cases or leading conditions, nearly all the modifications will soon suggest themselves. There are of course certain kinds of ground where it is safe to walk on the trail; but wherever you can keep away from it without losing it, it is better to do so.

  So far we have had no trouble in keeping the course of the trail. And after you once get well acquainted with a deer's habits about feeding, lounging, and going off to lie down, you will have little trouble in this respect. And you will have far less when you once know the ground well. But sometimes you will have some trouble with it, especially in brushy timber, in heavy pine where deer are apt to meander more in their course. And so during a storm, or in such timber as it is hard to keep your course in, such as heavy pine in a cloudy day. In all such cases you will have to swing in frequently upon the trail, taking advantage of course of any hollows, etc., to do so.

  We have also had no trouble this morning to keep out of sight. We shall often find ground where there is little shelter from friendly ridges. As I advised you before, such ground is generally unprofitable to the still-hunter. But if you happen to be on it you will find the advantages of side-tracking very great. The better way there, is to make half-circles, going far away from the trail, then coming down at right angles to it and keeping a most careful watch on both sides, then backing out and swinging around again. You can sometimes see the track at quite a distance, but rarely from a distance that is safe. You had better always depend upon your knowledge of the deer's course and upon occasional coming into the track.

  Sometimes a deer will make a circuit before lying down, and then lie down on one side of his main trail. In such case he is almost certain to see you if you are directly upon the trail, as you travel too much in his sight. Whereas if you circle it you may come in upon him from the side that he is not watching. Or if you happen on the other side of the main trail you will perhaps be so far off that he cannot see you, and when you finally miss the trail you may swing around the doubling point and come in upon him from be- hind. At all events, if a deer does play this trick on you, you are in no worse condition than if you were on the trail. And you may be in a much better one.

  Where a trail runs toward a heavy windfall into which you can see no better from one side than from the other, you may feel an inclination to keep close to the track because you feel that the deer, if inside the windfall, cannot see you. This is in a measure true.

  But he may have stopped just in the edge of it. If he has, you will be quite certain to lose him by a direct approach. Whereas if you circle around and come along the edge he will be much less apt to see you. And if he runs he will probably give you a much better shot by running away from it instead of plunging directly into it, as he would probably otherwise do.

  A hunter may picket his horse with a "granny- knot" on his neck and a slip-knot on the stake and may find him fast there in the morning. If he use a bowline-knot and a clove-hitch he will find him fast if nothing breaks. Yet the two latter knots take no more time or trouble to tie than the other. So there are many cases where it is as easy to follow the very tamest deer away off on one side as directly on the track. On the track may do; but the other way is vastly surer.

  How far this plan of side-tracking or circling will avail with antelope I cannot say. But they are such rangers that where it will be worth while to follow their tracks at all too much time would probably be lost by circling. Their eyes are moreover so keen when they are much hunted, and they keep such a constant watch upon every quarter of the horizon, especially when there are many together, that it may be doubted whether anything can be gained by the mere direction of approach.

Chapter XIII

Tracking On Bare Ground

 

  In tracking deer upon bare ground a difficulty meets us which is practically unknown in tracking upon snow; namely, recognizing the footprints. On snow one can generally watch the trail with an occasional side glance of the most careless kind, keeping all his attention directed toward catching first sight of the game. But on bare ground not only is keener sight necessary to detect the game, but a large part of the attention so necessary for that purpose has to be diverted toward finding and recognizing the footprints of the trail.

  I have read some very weak stuff about the stupendous difficulties of tracking upon bare ground. I have read very able articles by eminent sportsmen in our best magazines in which the tracking of a moose weighing nearly a thousand pounds was depicted as a vast 'and wondrous achievement, the ability to do which was reserved to the gifted Indian and denied to the poor Paleface. There are indeed some people who could not track an elephant through a dew-covered clover-patch; but there is not a backwoods boy of sixteen who ever has to hunt up a lost yearling calf in the woods, not a young vaquero in California who ever followed an animal over the rugged hills, who would not laugh at those articles and declare the author a gosling. The authors of such articles are, however, no such thing, but simply careless writers who allow their admiration of the Indian to run away with their pens. But the effect of all such stuff is bad. It deters from attempting tracking many a one who might easily attain, not great skill, but enough for good sport.

  There may be a hereditary tendency in the Indian which makes it more easy for him to learn tracking; but he has also vastly more practice. And herein lies the main secret perfect sight and practice, practice, practice. And with practice the average white man is fully equal to the average Indian. There will be a difference in individuals just as there is in the knack or facility of doing anything, and consequently some Indians will excel some white men. But if the average Indian excels the average white man, it is in what he will do and not in what he can do. He will run all day with nothing to eat, keeping a dog-trot nearly all the time for a single deer. The white man has more regard for the day of reckoning, and will rarely throw away his health or prematurely use up his strength for such a paltry reward as a deer. And just so the Indian will cling to a trail and eventually secure the game when the white man would give it up as involving more patience or work than the game was worth. The Indian hunts for food; when he sets out for it he is bound to have it, and he will continue the chase as long as daylight allows him. Here he undoubtedly excels. And, so far as I am concerned, he is triply welcome to all the glory of this superiority.

  Tracking on bare ground is, however, very often difficult, and is never any too easy. On some kinds of ground it is impossible for either white man or Indian to track an animal as light and as small-hoofed as a deer fast enough to be of any avail; and often where it can be done it is too tedious even for the Indian. He rarely tracks a single deer on most kinds of bare ground un- less it is wounded or deer are very scarce. Where a single track goes through heavy timber; where the ground is covered with dry dead leaves or dry dead grass; where it is very dry and hard, or is stony or frozen; where it is thickly covered with brush, dry weeds, canebrake, etc., rare is the hunter, either white or red, who will have patience to follow a track. And often they could not if they would. More often, however, they merely skip such places and. depend upon picking up the trail on better ground; but where the whole or greater part of the ground is of the nature above described, nearly all hunters let the tracks alone, unless they be tracks of a traveling band.

  But, on the other hand, there are some kinds of ground on which a deer can be followed with almost as much certainty as on snow, and so fast as to require little patience on the part of the hunter. Such are the bare hilly regions where the ground is not too rocky, and where little or no grass grows and the brush is not too thick. Such is almost all open ground when very wet and not too much covered with dead grass, weeds, etc.; such is most open ground covered with green grass, especially if the dew is on it; such is ground on which wild cattle range, and where the deer often follow the cattle-trails and make runways of their own from one trail to another. On these and various other kinds of ground it often is worthwhile to work up a trail of even a single deer; but just when and where this will be worthwhile depends so entirely upon the nature of the ground, the size of the deer, the distance it is likely to travel, the age of the track, its direction, the time of day, etc., that it is quite impossible to lay down any useful rule. It is a thing to be decided by the circumstances of each particular case.

  But though it may not be worthwhile to track a single deer on bare ground, the case is often quite different when there are several. A band of five or six deer is quite easy to follow, and even a doe and two fawns will keep so close together that where the track of one is extremely faint that of another nearby it is very plain. So long as they keep near together, so that one fills up the dim part of the trail of another, a band is quite easy to track; but when they begin to straggle out and wander here and there they get harder to follow, and, as before, in tracking on snow, it is now best to leave the tracks for a while and look out for the game from behind some ridge. Still it will not always be advisable to follow even a band, if deer are plenty enough without doing so; for though it is easier for you to see some of them, it is also much easier for them to see, or hear, or smell you. So if the ground is very level or brushy, with no good lookout-places or facilities for circling well, or if the wind be wrong, it is often best not to bother even with tracking several deer if others are plenty enough to give you a fair chance elsewhere.

  If you only expect to hunt a little at long intervals it will not be worthwhile to study tracking on bare ground, for to acquire sufficient skill to do it rapidly enough, and with certainty enough, requires unquestionably a large amount of practice. But, on the other hand, if you intend to do any considerable amount of still-hunting you should by all means practice it. And to begin this it is not necessary to wait until the necessity arises. The first steps in the art can be learned by practicing on your own trail.

  To do this go first upon ground that is soft enough to take the impression of your foot. After walking a hundred yards or so, circle around backward and look for your trail. Then follow it, not with your eyes upon any one track and then shifting to the next one, but with eyes fixed as far away, as possible, and with a gaze that takes in at once twenty-five or thirty feet of the trail. After trying this for a few days you will discover a marked difference in the speed with which your eye catches each footprint, in the distance at which it will catch them, and in the number it will take in at once. On each day look also for the tracks of the preceding day and days before that, until you can no longer find them ; and note care- fully the difference in the appearance of freshness, a very important point. When it becomes easy to find and follow your trail on such ground, change to more difficult ground. Unless you live in a large city all this kind of practice may easily be had near home. A cow or horse track, off the road, is also good to practice on. But remember to always try and see as far ahead as possible on the trail. Tracking does not, as some might suppose, consist in picking out each step by a separate search, but in a comprehensive view of the whole ground for several yards ahead.

  Sometimes it is necessary to grope one's way from step to step like a child in its primer, as where the trail gets very faint or turns much; but generally the experienced tracker reads several yards of the trail at a glance, just as the fluent reader does words in a book. The gaze is fixed quite as much on the surrounding ground, and the trail appears almost to stand out in relief.

  The appearance of a deer's track upon bare ground varies very much, and a trail may in a quarter of a mile run through a dozen or more variations. All appearances may, however, be included under the following heads, and the great majority of tracks you will see will correspond exactly with the description of the class :

 

   1st. Distinct impressions of the whole hoof.
   2nd. Faint impressions of only the points of the hoof.
   3rd. A slight rim of dirt or dust thrown up by the sharp edge of the hoof.
   4th. Slight scrapes upon hard ground, recognizable only by the change of color, being made by a faint grinding of the finest particles of the surface without any impression.
   5th. Mere touches or spots showing only a faint change in the shade of the color. There is scarcely any air so dry that the ground during the night will not absorb a trace of moisture. The least disturbance of the top particles of such soil, even without grinding them over each other, will make a difference in the shade of the color, which will be visible under some point of view though invisible from others, depending upon the direction of the light.
   6th. Crushing or grinding of the surface of friable rocks, and mere scrapes or scratches on harder rock or frozen ground.
   7th. Depressions in moss, grass, dead leaves, etc.
   8th. Dead leaves, sticks, etc., kicked or brushed aside or overturned, or broken or bent, etc.
   9th. A plain bending or separating of the spears of grass or weeds. This is generally caused by the feet treading down the stalks at the bottom and not as the next (No. 10) is.
   10th. A bending of the spears of grass or weeds, etc., by the legs of the passing animal. In this case the bend itself of the spears is hardly noticeable except by the change in the shade of light cast by them. In such case a faint streak of differently shaded color will be found running through the grass or weeds, visible only from some directions.
   11th. Change of color from brushing dew, raindrops, or frost from grass, weeds, etc.
   12th. Upturning of the under surfaces (generally moist) of stones, leaves, etc.

 

  These twelve classes include about all you will need to study. There are of course some others, but generally so accidental and rare that you had better skip such places and seek the trail farther on, such as the under surface of dry leaves pressed against wet ones beneath but not upturned. It will not be worthwhile to spend time on a trail in looking for such signs.

  Where the animal has run or bounded it is of course easy to follow. But this generally shows that you have alarmed it, or that someone else has. You already know your prospects in such v a case. About the only tracks worth following are those where the animal was walking, and these are the very hardest.

  I should deem it unnecessary to mention the peculiar shape of a deer's track had I not known the tracks of both hogs and sheep frequently taken for those of a deer. Both hogs and sheep have more round and uneven pointed hoofs than a deer has. A hog, too, spreads his toes out, and a sheep generally does more or less. A deer always keeps his toes tight together except when running, and sometimes when walking on wet and slippery ground. There is once in a great while a deer with spreading toes, and once in a great while a sheep with a foot almost like a deer's foot. But these are too rare to give you any trouble. The feet of an antelope are still sharper, if possible, than those of a deer, though there is often resemblance enough to deceive nearly any one judging by the mere footprints without regard to the nature of the ground, the number of animals, etc. A calf has also a spreading foot and much more rounding toes than those of a deer, as well as a larger hoof. The goat makes a solid track, very uneven in front. The difference in the distance of the step will generally settle most cases of doubt, as a deer has a much longer step than a sheep, hog, or goat. The feet of these animals also drag more in snow than do those of a deer.

  When the track runs over ground where it becomes hard to recognize it is best to skip that part and look for it farther on. And this must also be done where you can easily follow it but cannot do so without some danger of alarming the game ; as where the trail runs down a hill-side in plain view of the valley or basin in which the game is likely to be, or turns down wind, etc. etc. And where it is necessary to circle the trail when deer watch the back trail, etc. etc., it must be found again in the same way.

  In order to do this a knowledge of the deer's habits and movements is indispensable. So is a quick and comprehensive grasp of the features (or " lay of the land ") of the country where you do not already know them. You must know the kind of ground to which a deer is most likely to go at any particular time of day, the length of time he is likely to remain there, how far he is likely to travel, etc. etc., and be quick to see the most advantageous way to approach such places as the game may probably be in, as well as the best and easiest place to regain the trail. All of which will so vary with the locality and the wildness of the deer that little advice can be given about it except generally, as has been already somewhat done and will be continued farther on. And even where the trail is easily followed this kind of knowledge will enable you to make many advantageous flank movements, etc.

  The freshness of a track is generally less easy to determine upon bare ground than upon snow, though it can be done with far more certainty than one would suppose. It is indeed often more difficult than it is upon snow to distinguish a track five minutes old from one two or three hours old. And sometimes a difference of several hours cannot be noticed. But it is generally very easy to tell with certainty the track of to-day from that of yesterday. There are places, however, where sometimes even this can hardly be done, as in coarse dry sand, dry dead weeds and grass where the stalk does not straighten again, but the slant remains and continues to make a different shade of light, etc. etc.

  Where dew, frost, or rain-drops have been brushed from grass or weeds the freshness is of course unmistakable. So where wet leaves, stones, etc., have been upturned, if the air is dry the freshness is also easy to determine. The beginner will find little trouble with anything but dry ground, rocky ground, etc.

  And here he must learn to note the shade of color in case of mere scrapes, and the smoothness and fineness of the outlines in case of distinct impressions. Where tracks are not deep they are often obliterated in a few days, and this even without any rain or strong wind. There is always more or less moving of ants and birds over them ; there is always more or less dust falling from the air, the bushes, etc., and the faintest breeze stirs up more. If they do not in a few days obliterate a track all these things will quickly give it an appearance unmistakably old. The brighter color, too, of any track on dry ground will generally by one night, however dry the air may apparently be, be restored to the color of the ground around it, though the outline, if any, may yet remain distinct. On the dry hills of Southern California I have time and again noticed that tracks that I had followed with ease, and where the imprint of the hoof was perfect, were gone in four or five days, and this where there were no quails trooping over the trail. This same obliteration takes place there with the droppings during the dry season, though this occurs more slowly. They are not merely bleached out, but they disappear. This will sometimes happen in a fortnight or so, though more often it takes months. Where there is rain they will often go sooner. But color and gloss will generally determine their age anywhere.

  I have confined myself in this chapter only to very general hints, as nothing will supply the place of practice, and practice will supply all I have omitted. Without practice, and considerable of it, much success in bare tracking is out of the question. It is not half as hard as it is generally represented, but it is still no child's play. As long as you have to grope your way from track to track it will be too slow. You must study the ground until you can see tracks almost stick out from it, and see the line of the trail yards and rods ahead.

  The besetting sin of most trackers when upon bare ground is allowing the trail to take too much of their attention. And often while they are looking at the trail the game is looking at them.

  Sometimes it may be best to skip the whole of the trail, using its direction only as a general guide ; as where you find it leading from a spring toward some brushy basin upon the mountain-side, which is a favorite resort for deer during the day. And sometimes if you find a fresh trail coming down from such a place to a spring, but can find no trail returning, it may even be worthwhile to back-track the incoming trail, as the deer may have returned to the basin by a roundabout way, over ground or through brush where it is too hard to follow them. The size and character of the basin and the quantity of other good lying-down places must determine such questions.

  Sometimes you get personally acquainted with a certain deer or set of deer so that you not only know them by sight, but know their tracks at once; know where they will keep, where they will run if started, where they will be to-morrow if started to-day, etc. You come to know them perfectly, but there is always something the matter when you find them. They are too far, or jumping too high, or well, in short you have not yet got them. The tracks of such deer are a pretty sure guide to their whereabouts without adhering to the tracks themselves.

bottom of page